GPAI Code: who signed it and what it actually demonstrates
The GPAI Code is a voluntary route for demonstrating AI Act compliance, not immunity. This guide connects signatories, chapters, duties and verifiable evidence.
The GPAI Code is a voluntary route for demonstrating AI Act compliance, not immunity. This guide connects signatories, chapters, duties and verifiable evidence.
GPAI duties have applied since 2025; 2 August 2026 activates the Commission's enforcement and fining powers. The timeline depends on the model, date and each company's role.
The Commission proposed linking some high-risk obligations to the availability of standards and guidance, with different backstop dates. Reading the proposal requires separating legislative status, category, role, and trigger.
More than 800 figures backed a conditional prohibition. Turning it into policy requires an object, threshold, verification, authority and entry and exit rules.
The law separates frontier developers, large developers, public frameworks, model reports, incidents, and whistleblowers. Identifying subject, threshold, deadline, exception, and penalty prevents its scope from expanding or shrinking.
The parties propose a fund to settle claims over books obtained from pirate libraries. The deal still required court approval and does not make all training infringing.
Starting today, China requires visible notices and technical markers for synthetic content published online. WeChat, Douyin and Weibo have already adapted their platforms to rules that also hold users and distributors responsible.
Trump confirmed a 15% share of authorized chip sales to China, but the instrument was not public. How to distinguish a statement, license, fee and rule.
As of August 2, providers of general-purpose models must meet new transparency and copyright obligations to market them in the EU. Models posing systemic risks face additional safety requirements.
The White House has unveiled its AI action plan, with more than 90 measures and three executive orders. It prioritizes data centers, tech exports and ideological criteria for federal procurement.
A federal judge has ruled that Meta’s use of copyrighted books to train Llama was fair use in the Kadrey case. But the decision warns that AI could still damage the publishing market without reproducing the original works.
Judge William Alsup hands down the first substantive ruling on fair use in AI training: training on books is legal, but Anthropic will face trial for using pirated copies.
This website uses cookies to improve the browsing experience. Cookie policy.