IA 360
Current Affairs

Amodei Warns of White-Collar 'Bloodbath' From AI Job Losses

Anthropic's CEO tells Axios that AI could wipe out half of entry-level office jobs and push unemployment to 10-20% within one to five years. He's urging people to stop "sugar-coating" the warning.

6 min read Leer en español

Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, has issued a blunt warning about the future of office work: artificial intelligence could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs and spike unemployment to 10-20% within the next one to five years. He made the comments in an interview with Axios from his San Francisco office.

Amodei says AI companies and the U.S. government need to stop "sugar-coating" what's coming: the possible mass elimination of jobs across technology, finance, law, consulting and other white-collar professions, especially entry-level gigs.

"People Just Don't Believe It"

"Most of them are unaware that this is about to happen," Amodei told Axios. "It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it."

According to the outlet, almost no one is paying attention to the problem: lawmakers don't get it or don't believe it, business leaders are afraid to talk about it publicly, and many workers won't realize the risks until it's too late.

Steve Bannon, a top official in Trump's first term and host of one of the most influential podcasts in the MAGA movement, shares the concern and frames it in political terms: "I don't think anyone is taking into consideration how administrative, managerial and tech jobs for people under 30 — entry-level jobs that are so important in your 20s — are going to be eviscerated," he told Axios.

The Scenario Haunting Amodei

Amodei described to Axios a future of extreme contrasts that worries him: "Cancer is cured, the economy grows at 10% a year, the budget is balanced — and 20% of people don't have jobs."

The executive argued that those building this technology have a responsibility to fulfill: "We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming," he said. "I don't think this is on people's radar."

He acknowledged the paradox of his own position: "It's a very strange set of dynamics, where we're saying: 'You should be worried about where the technology we're building is going.'" To those who accuse him of hyping the technology for attention, Amodei has a response: "What if they're right?"

The Underlying Contradiction

Amodei made these remarks on the same day he had spent hours onstage showcasing his own technology's capabilities to code and power other AI products that replace human tasks. According to Axios, Anthropic released Claude 4, its new chatbot, last week, and revealed that testing showed the model was capable of "extreme blackmail behavior": when given access to emails suggesting it would soon be replaced by another AI system, the model responded by threatening to reveal an extramarital affair — detailed in those emails — involving the engineer in charge of the replacement.

Amodei acknowledges the contradiction, but maintains that workers are "already a little bit better off if we just managed to successfully warn people."

How the Problem Is Taking Shape, According to Amodei

Axios lays out the sequence that, according to Amodei and other industry executives, is already underway: major AI companies — OpenAI, Google, Anthropic and others — keep improving their language models' capabilities until they match or beat human performance on more and more tasks. The U.S. government, worried about losing ground to China or alarming workers, barely regulates or warns anyone. Most of the public, oblivious to AI's advance, pays little attention. And then, almost overnight, business leaders see the savings from replacing people with AI and do it at scale: they stop creating new positions, stop backfilling existing vacancies, and replace workers with agents or other automated tools.

Amodei notes that the shift from AI as a support tool to full automation of work "is going to happen in a small amount of time, like one or two years or less."

The Opposing View: Sam Altman's Case

Axios also presents the opposite view, embodied by Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI and Amodei's former boss, who makes the case for optimism grounded in the history of technological progress. In a September manifesto titled "The Intelligence Age," Altman wrote: "If a lamplighter could see the world today, he would think the prosperity all around him was unimaginable."

The First Signs Already Visible

Axios notes that some major companies are already cutting staff ahead of this shift. Microsoft has laid off 6,000 workers, roughly 3% of its workforce, many of them engineers. Walmart has eliminated 1,500 corporate positions as part of a streamlining effort ahead of what's coming. CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity firm, cut 500 jobs — 5% of its workforce — citing "a market and technology inflection point, with AI transforming every industry."

In January, Mark Zuckerberg told podcast host Joe Rogan that Meta and other companies in the sector would "probably in 2025" have AI capable of acting as a mid-level engineer writing code, reducing the need for human workers for that task. Shortly after, Meta announced plans to cut its workforce by 5%.

Aneesh Raman, LinkedIn's head of economic opportunity, warned this month in a New York Times opinion column, cited by Axios, that AI is breaking "the bottom rungs of the career ladder: junior software developers... junior paralegals and first-year associates at law firms who once cut their teeth reviewing documents."

Share this article

Related articles

Apple v. OpenAI, week 2: what's in the case file and what may come this week
Current Affairs

Apple v. OpenAI, week 2: what's in the case file and what may come this week

After Friday's headlines, the docket in case 5:26-cv-07078 spent its first weekend unchanged: the twelve entries are still the ones from day one. We go through them entry by entry — fees, summonses, an eight-lawyer team — and lay out the four procedural milestones that may land this week: the scheduling order, the first proofs of service, the injunction motion Apple has announced, and the July 24 decision on who judges the case.

3 min
Apple sues OpenAI: the partnership that brought ChatGPT to the iPhone ends up in court
Current Affairs

Apple sues OpenAI: the partnership that brought ChatGPT to the iPhone ends up in court

Apple accuses OpenAI, its hardware chief Tang Tan, engineer Chang Liu and io Products of misappropriating iPhone trade secrets to accelerate its first consumer device. The federal lawsuit, filed in San Jose, brings six claims and seeks injunctions and damages; OpenAI replies that it has "no interest in other companies' trade secrets." The case will test where the line sits between hiring talent and taking confidential know-how in the middle of the AI hardware race.

5 min

This website uses cookies to improve the browsing experience. Cookie policy.