IA 360
Current Affairs

Musk prepares X.AI to compete with OpenAI

Elon Musk has incorporated X.AI Corp, a new company targeting the artificial intelligence market. The move comes after ChatGPT’s success and as Musk calls for a pause in the development of systems more powerful than GPT-4.

4 min read Leer en español

Elon Musk has taken a formal step toward returning to the artificial intelligence business with X.AI Corp, a company registered in Nevada on March 9. Corporate filings list Musk as director and Jared Birchall, head of his family office, as secretary.

The initiative puts the entrepreneur up against OpenAI, the organization he co-founded in 2015 and left the board of in 2018. The new company has not yet announced a product or technical details, but the registration comes amid reports that Musk has been in contact with researchers and investors to launch his own AI project.

A new front in the rivalry with OpenAI

The timing is no coincidence. OpenAI has gone from being a lab known mainly in technology circles to occupying the center of the industry following the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 and GPT-4 this past March. Microsoft, its main partner, has integrated the technology into services such as Bing and strengthened an alliance that makes OpenAI one of the toughest rivals to catch.

Musk has openly challenged that evolution. His main criticism is that OpenAI was founded with a promise to develop artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity, under a nonprofit structure, and that its commercial relationship with Microsoft has transformed that original approach. OpenAI maintains a nonprofit entity that controls its structure, alongside a limited-profit subsidiary that finances the costly training of its models.

The disagreement is not merely about business. In late March, Musk signed an open letter alongside researchers and business leaders calling for a pause of at least six months in the training of systems more powerful than GPT-4. The letter called for shared safety protocols, independent oversight and rules to prevent the commercial race from driving developments that are difficult to control.

Starting a company of his own while calling for a pause may seem contradictory, but it reflects a central debate in the industry: who sets the rules for the most advanced models and what incentives shape them. Musk is not stepping away from AI; he is seeking the ability to influence its direction.

Musk already has experience, data and computing power

X.AI is not starting from scratch within Musk’s orbit. Tesla has spent years developing computer vision systems and neural networks for its assisted-driving features. The company is also working on Dojo, a computer designed to train models on the huge volumes of video collected by its vehicles.

Twitter, acquired by Musk in October 2022, is another potentially important piece. The platform hosts conversations, news and public content at massive scale—material that can be valuable for training language models. In recent weeks, reports have also linked purchases of thousands of Nvidia graphics processors to AI projects at Twitter, although their specific use has not been clarified.

Training models comparable to GPT-4, however, requires far more than access to data. It takes specialized chips, engineers capable of designing and fine-tuning the systems, power infrastructure and an investment of hundreds of millions of dollars. The shortage of graphics processors and the concentration of talent at a handful of companies make the competition difficult even for a billionaire.

More competition, but also more questions

X.AI’s arrival would add pressure to a market where Google is accelerating Bard, Anthropic is developing Claude and companies such as Meta maintain a significant position in research. For users and businesses, greater competition could mean more options, better performance and lower prices for access to generative models.

But the decisive question will be its approach. An AI company is defined not only by the model it trains, but also by what data it uses, how it evaluates its errors, what limits it places on its responses and who is accountable when it fails. Musk has made those issues part of his criticism of OpenAI. X.AI will have to show through its actions that it offers a different technical and safety alternative—not merely another competitor in the race to build ever-larger models.

Share this article

Related articles

Apple v. OpenAI, week 2: what's in the case file and what may come this week
Current Affairs

Apple v. OpenAI, week 2: what's in the case file and what may come this week

After Friday's headlines, the docket in case 5:26-cv-07078 spent its first weekend unchanged: the twelve entries are still the ones from day one. We go through them entry by entry — fees, summonses, an eight-lawyer team — and lay out the four procedural milestones that may land this week: the scheduling order, the first proofs of service, the injunction motion Apple has announced, and the July 24 decision on who judges the case.

3 min
Apple sues OpenAI: the partnership that brought ChatGPT to the iPhone ends up in court
Current Affairs

Apple sues OpenAI: the partnership that brought ChatGPT to the iPhone ends up in court

Apple accuses OpenAI, its hardware chief Tang Tan, engineer Chang Liu and io Products of misappropriating iPhone trade secrets to accelerate its first consumer device. The federal lawsuit, filed in San Jose, brings six claims and seeks injunctions and damages; OpenAI replies that it has "no interest in other companies' trade secrets." The case will test where the line sits between hiring talent and taking confidential know-how in the middle of the AI hardware race.

5 min

This website uses cookies to improve the browsing experience. Cookie policy.